http://www.techans.com/2008/06/digsby-scores-over-pidgin-in-multi-network-ims/ Technology Answers .... Simplified!! Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:55:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.techans.com/2008/06/digsby-scores-over-pidgin-in-multi-network-ims/comment-page-1/#comment-10305 Justin Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:37:18 +0000 http://www.techans.com/?p=20#comment-10305 You have forgotten one very important difference between Digsby and Pidgin. Digsby stores all your username/passwords on Digsby servers plus all of your traffic has to go through their servers. This is a major security and privacy issue. You have forgotten one very important difference between Digsby and Pidgin. Digsby stores all your username/passwords on Digsby servers plus all of your traffic has to go through their servers. This is a major security and privacy issue.

]]> http://www.techans.com/2008/06/digsby-scores-over-pidgin-in-multi-network-ims/comment-page-1/#comment-10304 Justin Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:37:18 +0000 http://www.techans.com/?p=20#comment-10304 You have forgotten one very important difference between Digsby and Pidgin. Digsby stores all your username/passwords on Digsby servers plus all of your traffic has to go through their servers. This is a major security and privacy issue. You have forgotten one very important difference between Digsby and Pidgin. Digsby stores all your username/passwords on Digsby servers plus all of your traffic has to go through their servers. This is a major security and privacy issue.

]]> http://www.techans.com/2008/06/digsby-scores-over-pidgin-in-multi-network-ims/comment-page-1/#comment-10189 hanum Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:04:40 +0000 http://www.techans.com/?p=20#comment-10189 yup.. very good for multiple logging messanger ^_^ yup.. very good for multiple logging messanger ^_^

]]> http://www.techans.com/2008/06/digsby-scores-over-pidgin-in-multi-network-ims/comment-page-1/#comment-179 Nikhil Pai Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:09:34 +0000 http://www.techans.com/?p=20#comment-179 I do agree that multinetwork messengers do leave out a few features from individual programs. But its a matter of personal choice to compromise with those features in favour of getting all contacts in one single program. I do agree that multinetwork messengers do leave out a few features from individual programs. But its a matter of personal choice to compromise with those features in favour of getting all contacts in one single program.

]]> http://www.techans.com/2008/06/digsby-scores-over-pidgin-in-multi-network-ims/comment-page-1/#comment-10407 Nikhil Pai Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:09:00 +0000 http://www.techans.com/?p=20#comment-10407 I do agree that multinetwork messengers do leave out a few features from individual programs. But its a matter of personal choice to compromise with those features in favour of getting all contacts in one single program. I do agree that multinetwork messengers do leave out a few features from individual programs. But its a matter of personal choice to compromise with those features in favour of getting all contacts in one single program.

]]> http://www.techans.com/2008/06/digsby-scores-over-pidgin-in-multi-network-ims/comment-page-1/#comment-64 All Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:45:05 +0000 http://www.techans.com/?p=20#comment-64 Do you think it's better to have a dedicated email client and a multinetwork-messenger than have one program that merges everything? It might be a bit too slow, or leave out some features from either type of program. I think pidgin is better multinetwork messenger, but digsby is a completely new hybrid (probably not to be compared with pidgin). Do you think it’s better to have a dedicated email client and a multinetwork-messenger than have one program that merges everything? It might be a bit too slow, or leave out some features from either type of program. I think pidgin is better multinetwork messenger, but digsby is a completely new hybrid (probably not to be compared with pidgin).

]]> http://www.techans.com/2008/06/digsby-scores-over-pidgin-in-multi-network-ims/comment-page-1/#comment-10406 All Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:45:00 +0000 http://www.techans.com/?p=20#comment-10406 Do you think it's better to have a dedicated email client and a multinetwork-messenger than have one program that merges everything? It might be a bit too slow, or leave out some features from either type of program. I think pidgin is better multinetwork messenger, but digsby is a completely new hybrid (probably not to be compared with pidgin). Do you think it’s better to have a dedicated email client and a multinetwork-messenger than have one program that merges everything? It might be a bit too slow, or leave out some features from either type of program. I think pidgin is better multinetwork messenger, but digsby is a completely new hybrid (probably not to be compared with pidgin).

]]>